Listen to this post

There have been recent growing concerns regarding the inhalation of crystalline silica dust in the California stone countertop industry, with attempts by the California State Legislature to enact regulations improving the occupational safety of workers fabricating stone slab products.1, 2 As this proposed legislation has developed, multiple studies have been conducted regarding safety measures that can be implemented for stone fabrication workers. Notably, some of those studies have revealed that effective methods to reduce occupational exposure to silica dust during fabrication exist and are feasible to implement by employers. While the research in the California stone countertop industry is still ongoing, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (“NIOSH”) has found that combining engineering controls and safer work practices would help greatly reduce the risk of harmful exposure to respirable silica dust.3, 4 Employers following this combination suggested by NIOSH in 2024 should make it feasible to safely work with stone slab products in California.

However, NIOSH has found there has been history of widespread employer noncompliance with California’s Title 8 standards that regulate the stone fabrication industry.[4] This widespread noncompliance is exactly why it is critical that the recommended safety measures are properly implemented by employers to keep trained employees safe. A failure to comply renders safety measures ineffective. For example, NIOSH recommends different types of respirators depending on the concentration of silica dust in the air, which employers can find through site testing.5 Particulate respirators can vary widely in their characteristics such as the type of filter (e.g., N, R, or P filters in the 95, 99, or 100 ranges), amount of face coverage (quarter mask vs. full face coverage), power, air-purifying, supplied-air, and positive pressure respirator safety measures. [7] In its recent survey of stone fabrication shops across California, some of the safety measures that Cal/OSHA has also found to be effective in lowering the exposure to silica dust in this industry include: 1) proper ventilation; 2) vacuums; 3) wet fabrication methods; 4) plumbing; 5) using respirators and other personal protective equipment. [3, 4] Of course, improving employee safety training was also found to be a measure that would reduce exposure to silica dust. [3, 4] Notably, these measures are not only practical, but are also cost-effective for employers to implement with no significant adverse economic impact to the industry in California.6, 7

The widespread noncompliance of employers that was discovered by Cal/OSHA naturally results in employees being less safe, as it would in any industry. As early as January 2019, Cal/OSHA initiated a Special Emphasis Program (“SEP”) for this industry in order to enforce compliance with California’s developing regulations. [4] The very creation of this SEP shows how widespread that noncompliance really was. As part of the SEP, Cal/OSHA began identifying active stone fabrication sites, conducting air sampling of workers at those sites, and determining whether any exposures to respirable silica were above permissible limits. Cal/OSHA estimated that out of 4,000 shop workers in California, about 3,000 – or 75% were likely exposed to respirable silica at or below permissible limits. [4] Thus, an estimated 25% of employers were found to have likely exposed employees to impermissible levels of respirable silica dust, a result that could have been avoided if those employers had followed Cal/OSHA and California’s regulations.

Owners of fabrication shops that do not meet their duty to be aware of the applicable regulatory safety standards and recommendations may place their employees and anyone present at their worksites at risk of exposure to unsafe levels of silica exposure. Cal/OSHA found that while workers in the stone countertop industry reported high levels of employer non-compliance with regulations pertaining to the inhalation of crystalline silica dust, workers in this industry are generally not represented by a labor union and are subject to retaliation for reporting workplace hazards. [5] Therefore, some workers are disincentivized from filing formal complaints with regulatory agencies like Cal/OSHA even if their employers do not follow regulations and/or fail to implement safety measures for their employees.

This landscape is still developing, but looking forward, Cal/OSHA has notably rejected a proposal to impose bans on types of stone slab products given the concern that such bans could incentivize the industry to simply move to other states where there is no ban is in place. Such a ban may also result in the rise of illegal and unregulated fabrication shops to skirt Cal/OSHA’s requirements. [5][6] Thus, instead of imposing a blanket ban on the industry, the agency is recognizing the continued need to study and explore the implementation of further cost-effective regulations. This way, the agency can keep a watchful eye on employers in the the stone countertop industry to ensure that exposure levels remain safe.

  1. California Assembly Bill 3043, introduced on February 16, 2024, withdrawn on July 3, 2024. ↩︎
  2. California Senate Bill 20, introduced on December 3, 2024. ↩︎
  3. Qi, C. and A. Echt. Engineering Control of Silica Dust from Stone Countertop Fabrication and Installation – Evaluation of Wetting Methods for Grinding. Comprehensive Report. EPHB Report No. 2024-DFSE-1618. Washington, DC, USA. June 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/2021-DFSE-710.pdf. ↩︎
  4. Qi, C. Investigation of Ventilation Engineering Controls for Stone Countertop Fabrication. Comprehensive Report. EPHB Report No. 2024-DFSE-1618. Washington DC, USA. February 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/surveyreports/pdfs/2024-DFSE-1618.pdf. ↩︎
  5. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. Silica, crystalline (as respirable dust). https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0684.html. ↩︎
  6. State of California – Department of Industrial Relations, Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board. Initial Statement of Reasons, California Code of Regulations, Title 8, General Industry Safety Orders Section 5204 Occupational Exposures to Respirable Crystalline Silica. htps://www.dir.ca.gov/oshsb/documents/Respirable-Crystalline-Silica-Non-Emergency-ISOR.pdf. ↩︎
  7. State of California – Department of Industrial Relations, Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board. Public Hearing Notice. Published May 3, 2024. https://www.dir.ca.gov/oshsb/documents/noticeJun2024-Respirable-Crystalline-Silica-Non-Emergency.pdf. ↩︎
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Paul Calfo Paul Calfo

As part of his extensive products and toxic tort practice, Paul handles a diverse range of products cases from chemical exposure and contamination to heavy machinery and lithium-ion battery fires. His California-based practice includes handling individual cases as well as large, high-risk matters…

As part of his extensive products and toxic tort practice, Paul handles a diverse range of products cases from chemical exposure and contamination to heavy machinery and lithium-ion battery fires. His California-based practice includes handling individual cases as well as large, high-risk matters arising from mass casualty injury and death events. He regularly and directly manages state and nationwide coordinated, related, and multidistrict dockets of toxic tort litigation with exposure claims related to chemicals such as PFAS and minerals such as asbestos. Paul has also handled cases involving glyphosate and orally ingested products/supplements.

In Los Angeles County, Paul regularly handles cases that fall under California’s Section 36, which provides plaintiffs with various means to rapidly move complex cases to trial within four months. Although such motions are routinely filed by plaintiffs and granted, Paul’s dogged refusal to concede have led to courts ruling in his favor, defeating Section 36 motions and leading to favorable resolution for firm clients.

Paul also handles products liability matters for multi-national franchisor corporations. He understands the complex underlying business relationships of companies while also understanding the potential liability of a complicated component or end-product. He is especially enthusiastic about cases that require him to dive into new products, and he aims to convey clients’ missions to a jury. Paul also enjoys working closely with our clients to synthesize the research and development needed to make products safe so that innovation can flourish.

A member of the firm’s Mass Tort & Product Liability team, Paul was the first associate to join the Los Angeles office after its opening. This situation presented an unusual opportunity to support partners across various teams with a broad array of litigation. Even early in his practice, Paul cut his teeth by representing both plaintiffs and defendants in everything from breach of contract, real estate, and premises cases to complex credit lending and corporate ownership disputes. He quickly learned transferable skills and a strategic overview of how best to work up and resolve or push different types of cases to trial. Paul continues to spread his practice between product liability and a variety of complex commercial litigation, and clients appreciate his ability to assist with multiple matters.

Paul handles matters in state court, federal court, and arbitration. He has spent extensive time in the courtroom from the beginning of his career, thriving on litigation strategy, trial, and oral argument. With a passion for chewing on difficult problems and finding backdoor solutions, Paul is always thinking about the challenges of clients’ cases.

Outside of the courtroom, Paul is an active member of the firm. He is a frequent mentor and a member of firm committees, and he enjoys guiding new associates so they can realize their full potential. He is a regular mentor of our first-year associates, with his favorite phrase being, “Get comfortable being uncomfortable; that mindset is the best way to grow.”

Before joining the firm, Paul interned as a member of the White House Counsel’s Office, where he participated in the resolution of various policy issues and confronted constitutional questions on the separation of executive and congressional power. Paul assisted with executive branch ethics codes as well as legal research concerning executive orders and the First and Fourteenth Amendments. He also assisted in preparing federal judicial nominees at all appellate levels for congressional hearings.

Photo of Ronald Tran Ronald Tran

Ronald defends clients in toxic tort lawsuits and commercial litigation.

Ronald discovered a fascination with the law in college when he began reading legal textbooks from front to back. He loves legal theory and applying the logic of the law to various cases,

Ronald defends clients in toxic tort lawsuits and commercial litigation.

Ronald discovered a fascination with the law in college when he began reading legal textbooks from front to back. He loves legal theory and applying the logic of the law to various cases, and he’s passionate about the opportunities for research and logical argument development that litigation presents.

Ronald began his career at a public entity defense firm where he represented local government, honing his litigation abilities in cases filed against various Los Angeles government entities. He defended civil rights and personal injury claims in both state and federal court and became extensively familiar with the discovery and trial preparation processes. However, he knew his preference as an MBA graduate was to represent businesses, and Ronald eventually joined Husch Blackwell out of his desire to work closely with corporate clients.

Today, Ronald represents clients across various industries, including the automotive, safety, construction and pharmaceutical sectors, in asbestos claims and other business litigation cases. He frequently works with expert witnesses and firm’s network of subject-matter experts to develop defenses consistent with medical science.

Thanks to his business education, Ronald is known for his understanding of client business goals, needs and motivations. He readily grasps the client perspective and works to tailor his litigation strategies to fit clients’ unique business situations.