In 2019, the Missouri legislature passed Senate Bill 224 (SB 224), effectively revising Missouri’s discovery rules to align them with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See our 2019 post for analysis of SB 224’s changes to the Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure.) The applicability of SB 224’s revisions remained unclear for some time, however, as the Missouri Supreme Court hesitated to adopt them into the Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure.

That changed earlier this month when the Missouri Supreme Court officially amended the Rules to reflect the revisions outlined in SB 224. Of the more noteworthy changes to the Rules is Rule 56.01(b)(1), which now requires that all discovery be proportional to the needs of the case, just as in federal court. Additionally, Rule 56.01(b)(9) now contains clawback provisions for any privileged material and specifically provides that production of such material, whether inadvertent or not, is not a waiver of privilege. And Rule 56.01(b)(3) addresses electronically stored information for the first time.

The new Rules also substantially rein in litigants’ ability to serve discovery requests. For instance, whereas the Missouri Rules previously contained no cap on the amount of requests a party could serve on its opponent, Rule 57.01(a) now specifically limits parties to no more than 25 interrogatories, including subparts, and Rule 58.01(a) limits each side (plaintiffs, defendants, third-party defendants) to no more than 10 depositions. Similarly, Rule 58.01(b)(4) restricts the length of depositions to no more than seven hours. There is, however, a caveat to the seven-hour cutoff: Missouri courts may allow additional time for the duration of depositions consistent with Rule 56.01 if needed to fairly examine the deponent or if the deponent, another person, or any other circumstance impedes or delays the examination. Rule 57.03(b)(5)(A).

The new Rules officially take effect on September 2, 2021 and will apply to all cases filed thereafter. Pending cases, moreover, may be subject to the new Rules under Missouri Rule 41.06, which provides for retroactive application to the extent such application is feasible and would not work injustice.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Tanner Cook Tanner Cook

Tanner focuses his practice on litigation and enjoys collaborating with clients to customize litigation to their business needs. Working with legal teams across the firm, he builds active defense strategies for clients in order to mitigate and solve complex litigation issues, and he

Tanner focuses his practice on litigation and enjoys collaborating with clients to customize litigation to their business needs. Working with legal teams across the firm, he builds active defense strategies for clients in order to mitigate and solve complex litigation issues, and he prides himself on addressing each matter efficiently and thoroughly. Known for his clear and concise legal communication, Tanner aims to serve as a true business partner as well as an attorney.

Photo of Michael Hopkins Michael Hopkins

As a commercial litigation attorney, Michael advocates for clients inside and outside of the courtroom. Devoted to helping clients and easing worries, Michael works closely with clients to discover how resolutions to litigation align with business operations. He aims to keep companies –

As a commercial litigation attorney, Michael advocates for clients inside and outside of the courtroom. Devoted to helping clients and easing worries, Michael works closely with clients to discover how resolutions to litigation align with business operations. He aims to keep companies – large and small, across industry sectors – efficiently running without interruptions.

Photo of Tim Larkin Tim Larkin

Tim is a toxic tort and product liability attorney passionate about the benefits the law provides. His practice focuses on the defense of complex, multi-party civil cases, including all aspects of product liability, consumer fraud and mass toxic tort. Tim sees the

Tim is a toxic tort and product liability attorney passionate about the benefits the law provides. His practice focuses on the defense of complex, multi-party civil cases, including all aspects of product liability, consumer fraud and mass toxic tort. Tim sees the law as a strategy game: his understanding of the science, medical issues, factual investigation and complexity of toxic tort claims help him craft legal arguments and plan the best defense possible for clients to achieve a successful resolution.