Listen to this post

Oklahoma has now joined many other states creating specialty business courts to handle complex business litigation. Senate Bill 632 creates two new specialized business courts, which will be located in Oklahoma County and Tulsa County. Oklahoma’s Governor, with the advice and consent of the Senate, is authorized to appoint a judge for an eight-year term for each location from a list of three candidates provided by the Speaker of the House. 

The new business courts will have jurisdiction to hear complex cases. The legislation states that an action is “presumptively complex” if it involves antitrust or trade regulation claims, intellectual property matters including, but not limited to, trade secrets, copyrights, and patents, securities claims or investment losses involving more than two parties, “environmental or toxic tort claims involving more than two parties, ownership or control of business claims, insurance claims, construction defect claims involving many parties or structures, product liability claims or mass tort claims.” 

The business courts’ jurisdiction will also specifically include business disputes arising under the Oklahoma Uniform Arbitration Act, the Oklahoma Uniform Commercial Code, the Oklahoma General Corporation Act, the Oklahoma Limited Liability Company Act, the Oklahoma Revised Uniform Partnership Act, the Oklahoma Uniform Limited Partnership Act of 2010, the Oklahoma Uniform Securities Act of 2004, and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act. Jurisdiction will also include:

  • Shareholder and unitholder derivative actions;
  • Matters that relate to the internal affairs of business, including but not limited to, rights or obligations between or among business participants regarding the liability or indemnity of business participants, officers, directors, managers, trustees, controlling shareholders or members or partners; 
  • Matters where the complaint includes professional malpractice claims arising out of a business dispute;
  • Matters involving tort claims “between or among two or more business entities or individuals as to their business or investment activities relating to contracts, transactions, or relationships between or among such entities or individuals,”
  • Matters involving breach of contract, fraud, or misrepresentation between businesses arising out of business transactions or relationships, and
  • Matters arising from e-commerce agreements, technology licensing agreements including, but not limited to, software and biotechnology license agreements, or any other agreement involving the licensing of any intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, and agreement relating to patent rights and involving commercial real property. 

The effective date of the new law is September 1, 2025; however, no action is to be filed, transferred, or removed to a business court prior to January 1, 2026. The measure was approved by the Governor on May 29, 2025.

It appears that the bill effectively consolidates all toxic tort claims to one of two courts in Oklahoma.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Sarah M. Davis Sarah M. Davis

Sarah began her legal career at the start of the second wave of asbestos cases: it was 2001, and a partner assigned her to a handful of matters in a practice area that conventional wisdom believed was on its way out. Instead, asbestos…

Sarah began her legal career at the start of the second wave of asbestos cases: it was 2001, and a partner assigned her to a handful of matters in a practice area that conventional wisdom believed was on its way out. Instead, asbestos litigation quickly took off, and Sarah found herself handling a higher case volume than any of the more experienced attorneys in her office, with multiple trial settings every week and a docket of more than 10,000 plaintiffs. The baptism of fire gave her hands-on experience early in her career with all aspects of litigation and trial, rapidly teaching her the ins and outs of the mass tort world.

In addition to 20+ years as a Texas asbestos attorney, Sarah also served as a state representative from 2011-2021 while continuing to practice law. She had the opportunity in the state legislature to author portions of the asbestos tort reform that governs Texas asbestos cases today: in other words, Sarah doesn’t just know the law; she’s also the one who wrote it.

Today, Sarah devotes the majority of her practice to Texas asbestos litigation, primarily representing contractors. She has experience in all types of motion practice and is a seasoned mediator who has also tried a number of cases to verdict. Over the course of her career, she’s picked hundreds of juries, and she knows the practice inside and out. After two decades in the field, she’s built relationships with most plaintiff’s attorneys, and she’s deeply familiar with the thinking of the MDL judge who rules on nearly all Texas asbestos cases.

Sarah is known as a straight talker who deals fairly and honestly with clients and with opposing counsel. She often represents the same clients for many years, building loyal long-term relationships, and she aims not only to solve clients’ problems, but to make clients’ jobs easier along the way.

Photo of Jen Dlugosz Jen Dlugosz

Jen focuses her practice on defending businesses in toxic tort and product liability matters in some of the most dangerous jurisdictions across the United States. In addition to product liability and toxic tort experience, Jen’s broad range of litigation experience…

Jen focuses her practice on defending businesses in toxic tort and product liability matters in some of the most dangerous jurisdictions across the United States. In addition to product liability and toxic tort experience, Jen’s broad range of litigation experience includes commercial litigation, white collar investigations, qui tam litigation, insurance litigation and contract disputes. Jen also maintains an active pro bono practice.

Photo of Julie Friedman Julie Friedman

With nearly 20 years of experience in the toxic tort practice area, Julie has defended manufacturers, suppliers, and contractors, including Fortune 500 companies, in mass and toxic tort litigation, with an emphasis on asbestos litigation and high exposure cases. As national coordinating counsel…

With nearly 20 years of experience in the toxic tort practice area, Julie has defended manufacturers, suppliers, and contractors, including Fortune 500 companies, in mass and toxic tort litigation, with an emphasis on asbestos litigation and high exposure cases. As national coordinating counsel for a multinational conglomerate corporation, she has tried cases to verdict in state and federal courts across the country. Julie also plays an integral role in developing and driving nationwide litigation strategy for the same client.

In addition to her national trial work, Julie serves as local counsel to various clients in the West Virginia and western Pennsylvania area, handling cases from inception through settlement negotiations. She is highly experienced at representing defendants in notoriously difficult jurisdictions.

Julie is known for her effective communication style: she has a gift for explaining detailed scientific and legal matters in a way that jurors can readily understand, and she easily builds trust in the courtroom. She places a high priority on developing and maintaining in-depth knowledge of the science and medicine behind clients’ cases, making her a better advocate and a more effective strategist. Clients also appreciate Julie’s ability, honed through decades of experience, to consider both the intricate details and the broader picture of each case. She instinctively understands how each piece of litigation fits in with a nationwide strategy.

Most of all, though, Julie has a strong reputation for caring deeply about clients. No client is ever just a number to her, and she aims to build lasting relationships over many years, investing deeply in clients’ success.

Photo of Michael Klebanov Michael Klebanov

Clients turn to Michael for high-stakes class action defense and appellate litigation. With his expertise in bet-the-company class actions, he defends a variety of challenges to companies’ practices and products, including claims based on breach of contract, warranties, product mislabeling and misrepresentation, deceptive…

Clients turn to Michael for high-stakes class action defense and appellate litigation. With his expertise in bet-the-company class actions, he defends a variety of challenges to companies’ practices and products, including claims based on breach of contract, warranties, product mislabeling and misrepresentation, deceptive trade practices, negligence, RICO and securities violations. Michael also has multidistrict litigation (MDL) experience.