Listen to this post

As discussed in the Product Perspective, the Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 (MoCRA) represents a major shift in cosmetic industry regulations. This article is one of a series of posts diving into each aspect of MoCRA. Here, we will introduce the FDA’s online portal, FDA Direct, and show how it can be used for complying with MoCRA’s Facility Registration and Cosmetic Listing requirements.

The FDA previously announced that facility registration and cosmetic listing required under MoCRA could be completed online. The FDA’s online portal, FDA Direct, is now live and available for use.

Facility Registration

FDA Direct allows owners and operators of facilities producing cosmetic products to Register New Facilities, Amend Facility Registrations, or comply with Renewal Requirements. A New Facility Registration can be created using the Cosmetic Product Facility Registration form in the Cosmetic Registration and Listing section.

Users should be prepared to provide a Facility Name, Facility DUNS Number (optional), information about the Facility including Facility contact information, and a Facility FEI Number (existing FEI numbers can be found and new FEI numbers can be requested here.)

Next, information can be entered about the produced cosmetics including Brand Names, Responsible Persons, and Product Categories. Multiple Brand Names can be listed for each facility. Once all required information has been submitted, the facility registration can be submitted to the FDA for validation and processing.

Cosmetic Product Listing

FDA Direct can also be used to comply with MoCRA’s requirements that marketed cosmetic products be listed with the FDA. Users will find the Cosmetic Product Listing Home Page where they can view any previous submissions and submit new Cosmetic Product Listings.

New Product Listings can be created from a blank form and will require information including FEI Numbers for each facility where the product is produced, information on the Responsible Person, the label name of the product, applicable cosmetic category(ies) for the product, the Product Listing Number (if any previously assigned), and a list of ingredients including any fragrances, flavors, or colors as required under 701.3 of title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regulations).

Alternatively, New Product Listings can be created by uploading FDA accepted SPL files previously created, useful for bulk submissions.

Husch Blackwell’s attorneys are available to consult with clients on a range of issues involving the new MoCRA requirements. Do not hesitate to reach out to our team for further guidance, and stay tuned for additional MoCRA posts on our blog.


Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Brady Hunt Brady Hunt

Brady focuses his practice on toxic tort litigation, primarily cases involving asbestos, and general litigation. As a Pittsburgh-area native, he’s enthusiastic about the historical research many cases require, and he feels a personal connection to the people, industries, companies, and products that have…

Brady focuses his practice on toxic tort litigation, primarily cases involving asbestos, and general litigation. As a Pittsburgh-area native, he’s enthusiastic about the historical research many cases require, and he feels a personal connection to the people, industries, companies, and products that have long been an integral part of his region. Brady serves on both national coordinating counsel teams for multinational corporations as well as local counsel teams handling matters in western Pennsylvania and West Virginia. He plays a key role in day-to-day case management, overseeing dockets and ensuring that client litigation remains on track and within deadlines. Brady regularly attends court, argues motions, participates in depositions, and keeps clients apprised of developments.

Known for his persuasive skills, Brady believes the first step in gaining the confidence of an audience is truly believing in one’s own position. In his career, Brady has achieved notable, at times unexpected, positive results in the courtroom for his clients. Clients also appreciate his diligence and dedication to their cases: Brady takes pride in being on top of even the smallest details, and clients can have confidence their litigation is in good hands.

Photo of Magda Patitsas Magda Patitsas

Magda has extensive experience in complex product liability litigation defending manufactures of talc products, consumer products, medical devices, and mechanical devices in state and federal courts. She handles product liability, personal injury and premises liability cases including multi-district litigation, class actions and individual

Magda has extensive experience in complex product liability litigation defending manufactures of talc products, consumer products, medical devices, and mechanical devices in state and federal courts. She handles product liability, personal injury and premises liability cases including multi-district litigation, class actions and individual product defense. As national coordinating counsel in widespread toxic tort litigation, Magda works with a network of internal and external counsel and experts to achieve clients’ business objectives through the optimal litigation strategy.

Photo of Seth Mailhot Seth Mailhot

With an education in chemical engineering and a prior career at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Seth brings clients rare regulatory insight on food, medical device and drug matters. As Leader of the firm’s FDA group, Seth handles a broad array…

With an education in chemical engineering and a prior career at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Seth brings clients rare regulatory insight on food, medical device and drug matters. As Leader of the firm’s FDA group, Seth handles a broad array of matters involving FDA-regulated products and services including food, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, tobacco, radiation-emitting electronic products and cosmetics.