Listen to this post

As the demand for clean energy and transportation grows, so does the need for rechargeable batteries. Lithium-ion batteries are widely used, from small toys to electric cars to large energy storage systems. While some lithium-ion batteries are already subject to regulations, rechargeable batteries used in “micro-mobility devices” such as electric bikes and scooters are currently not subject to any federal safety standards. Some advocates contend that a lack of regulation has led to an increase in fires caused by poor quality, defective batteries. According to a report by CBS News New York, defective lithium-ion batteries have allegedly resulted in 400 fires, 300 injuries, and 12 deaths between 2019 and 2023 in New York City alone.

On March 24, 2023, Representative Ritchie Torres of New York introduced the “Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act” in the U.S. House of Representatives.[1] This bill would require the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) to devise product safety standards for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries within one year of enactment, specifically to protect against the risk of fires. The product safety standards would include regulations for chargers, cables, battery pack external terminals, micromobility device external terminals, and free-standing recharging stations.

Although the CPSC has not established any safety standards prior to this bill being introduced to Congress, it has interjected when necessary to highlight the hazards of improperly manufactured lithium-ion batteries. In December 2022, CPSC sent a letter to over 2000 businesses that operate in the lithium-ion space, urging those businesses to strive for compliance with applicable safety standards such as the Underwriters Laboratories (“UL”) “2272, Systems for Personal E-Mobility Devices”, and UL “2849, Standards for Safety for Electrical Systems for eBikes”. UL currently certifies electronic products that meet safety standards.[2]

On May 19, 2023, CPSC issued a statement by Commissioner Mary Boyle, which acknowledged the need for safety standards and a request for public comment on the current regime of lithium-ion safety standards. While speaking at a lithium-ion battery conference a few months later, Commissioner Boyle went even further and stated that CPSC would propose mandatory safety standards at some point in 2024.  Of note, this announcement was made approximately seven months after the “Setting Consumer Standards for Lithium-Ion Batteries Act” was introduced in Congress.

Cities such as New York City have already implemented safety standards at the local level. It is likely that the standards set forth by CPSC would incorporate portions of already existing state safety standards. During a news conference while introducing the bill, Rep. Torres offered a similar sentiment towards incorporating the Underwriters Laboratories standards into the federal regulations.

In addition to current state and local standards, organizations such as the Department of Transportation (“DOT”) will likely be looked to for assistance with developing these standards. DOT currently designates lithium-ion batteries as hazardous materials and therefore subjects them to certain regulations such as the requirement that lithium-ion batteries be tested prior to being shipped into the United States. These testing requirements can be found in the United Nations Manual of Tests and Criteria. The most relevant test includes a thermal test where “[t]est cells and batteries are to be stored for at least six hours at a test temperature equal to 72 +/- 2 ℃, followed by storage for at least six hours t a test temperature equal to -40+/-2 ℃. The maximum time interval between test temperature extremes is 30 minutes. This procedure is to be repeated until 10 total cycles are complete, after which all test cells and batteries are to be stored for 24 hours at ambient temperature (20 +/- 5 ℃).” [3] On May 15, 2024, the bill was passed as amended by the house by a bipartisan vote of 374 to 34, and referred to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. On July 31st, 2024, the bill passed the Senate Committee favorably and without amendment and now awaits the vote in the Senate. Industry groups have also expressed their support for this bill. Consumer Reports commended the bill as a “critical step forward in protecting consumers from preventable fires.” New York City Fire Department Commissioner Laura Kavanagh stated that “this bill is the first step in what must be a long-term, nationwide conversation.” Until this bill is passed into law, the current state regime will control this space. Even if this bill is passed, advocates believe that any federal regulations put forth by the CPSC would operate as a “floor” or a framework for states to draft their own safety standards.


[1] That same bill was introduced in the Senate by Senator Kristen Gillibrand of New York on March 28, 2023. 

[2] “Important Safety Information Concerning Micromobility Devices”, United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, December 19, 2022

[3] United Nations (“U.N.”) Manual of Tests and Criteria, Sub-section 38.3

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Thomas Cocchi Thomas Cocchi

Thomas represents clients in toxic tort and product liability matters, helping develop long-term strategies.

Thomas grew up wanting to be an attorney like his childhood hero, Abraham Lincoln. He realized as an adult that his grade school dream truly was a perfect fit:

Thomas represents clients in toxic tort and product liability matters, helping develop long-term strategies.

Thomas grew up wanting to be an attorney like his childhood hero, Abraham Lincoln. He realized as an adult that his grade school dream truly was a perfect fit: he was fascinated by legal arguments, loved the trial preparation process and thrived on the intellectual challenge of practicing law. Thomas gained a wide variety of commercial and civil litigation experience early in his career and is extensively familiar with the courtroom. He’s passionate about building new arguments and finding new applications of the law.

Today, Thomas focuses his practice on toxic tort and product liability matters and is particularly experienced at asbestos litigation, which arises frequently in the West Virginia and western Pennsylvania venues where he often works. He values practicing in a broad area of law where each case and its trial preparation differ subtly.

Known for his focus on the big picture, Thomas understands that mass tort litigation is nearly always far more extensive for clients than a single case. He is aware that any strategy he pursues, any outcome he achieves, any settlement he negotiates can set precedent for the client nationwide, and he takes care to ensure that his efforts are in line with broader needs and goals. Thomas aims to help clients develop sustainable long-term toxic tort strategies, and clients comment that he leaves them feeling confident they’re prepared for future litigation.

Photo of Brandan Mueller Brandan Mueller

As a member of the firm’s Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation team, Brandan represents clients in the defense and prosecution of cases involving product liability, transportation matters, complex commercial litigation, construction law, insurance law and personal injury. He has focused extensively on product liability…

As a member of the firm’s Technology, Manufacturing & Transportation team, Brandan represents clients in the defense and prosecution of cases involving product liability, transportation matters, complex commercial litigation, construction law, insurance law and personal injury. He has focused extensively on product liability cases involving fires and explosions as well as on toxic tort matters.

Photo of Jonathon Duffy Jonathon Duffy

Jonathon defends clients in product liability and labor and employment matters. Jonathon focuses his current practice on product liability and employment law. He defends clients against various chemical exposure allegations and is particularly experienced with mold after representing a military housing provider whose…

Jonathon defends clients in product liability and labor and employment matters. Jonathon focuses his current practice on product liability and employment law. He defends clients against various chemical exposure allegations and is particularly experienced with mold after representing a military housing provider whose properties allegedly contained the substance. His litigation experience also includes mediation relating to employee dismissal after FMLA leave. In addition, Jonathon counsels clients on federal and state employment law, helping them avoid potential litigation. He frequently advises on employee handbooks and necessary revisions after new legislation.